Log In
Access Premium Site»
Not a member? Join today!

Development of the Hangar 9 Ultimate Biplane, Designer Mike McConville Shares his thoughts.

Development of the Hangar 9 Ultimate Biplane, Designer Mike McConville Shares his thoughts.

While putting together the October 2012 “Let’s Talk Giant Scale” column discussing Flying Wires and Wing Struts, columnist John Glezellis discussed the need for functional rigging with RC aircraft designer, Mike McConville.  Mike developed the very popular Hangar 9 Ultimate biplane which, unlike most biplanes, doesn’t require flying wires. Let’s see what Mike did during the development process!

“The Hangar 9 Ultimate is probably one of my most popular and long lasting designs. I think it owes a lot of its success to its simplicity of design and versatility of flight performance. My first versions had a much thinner wing section than the production version of the aircraft that most are familiar with. While I do prefer a thin wing section on most aerobatic designs, I did not want flying wires to be a requirement like they were on my first Ultimate prototypes. They are very cumbersome to rig and make field assembly a real pain. Enough that I believe requiring them on the Ultimate would have been a deal breaker for most modelers.

With the goal in mind to make the wings reasonably thin, yet thick enough to be structurally sound without any rigging, I chose the 12% thick airfoil that is used on the Ultimate. I knew the diameter of wing tube that I wanted to use and based on past experience, I knew it would be adequate. I then selected the minimum thickness airfoil that would allow the wing tube to fit in the structure. It proved to be a great compromise and yielded a very strong biplane that was both competitive in IMAC as well as being a great 3D model. I have even had some very good 3D pilots comment that it is a “3D trainer”.

I remember working all hours to finish the final version just a few days before the 2002 IMAC NATS where I did unveil it, and finished 2nd after only 2 days of hurried trimming. I think that was a real testimony to how easy it is to fly well. For 3D and freestyle flying, I flew the Ultimate in two of the three XFC’s that I competed in, placing 3rd in 2003. I’ve threatened for a while now to do an updated version of the Ultimate. Maybe someday I might do just that!”

Updated: July 16, 2015 — 4:27 PM

1 Comment

Add a Comment
  1. I’m an ultimate fan, really like that flight envelope.
    One simple question, why you dont design an 50cc or 30cc version? Nowadays its the very commom engine model type that make easy to carry and assembly on the field. Only aeroworks is producin an really scale good flight model. I believe the hangar9 can make a better one. Regards

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Airage Media © 2016
WordPress Lightbox Plugin