Real or RC? (It’s both!)

Oct 01, 2013 3 Comments by

The F-16 is familiar to airplane enthusiasts as the nimble American jet fighter, in service since the 1970s, with a nose like a heron with a severe underbite. Last week saw the maiden flight of the QF-16, which is just an F-16 with one modification: no pilot inside.

Drones are everywhere these days, from battlefields to toy stores and music videos, but most are slow, relatively underpowered, and valuable only because they can stay in the air for long periods of time or because they’re cheap. This QF-16, on the other hand, is a drone with an afterburner that can fly at one-and-a-half times the speed of sound. In its first test flight from Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida, the plane executed a barrel roll as well as a “split S”—a (very fun-sounding) move in which the plane flips over onto its back and then does half a loop so it ends up headed, right-way-up, in the opposite direction—before executing a perfect landing back at the base.

Six formerly mothballed F-16’s have been retrofitted into QF-16’s, according to Boeing spokesperson Michelle Shelhamer, and next week they’ll be flown—by actual pilots sitting inside them—to their new home at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico.

It isn’t the first time an old jet fighter has been turned into a remote-control plane. The Air Force has done the same thing to Vietnam-era F-4 Phantoms. Like those older fighters, the QF-16 is going to be used as a target in live-fire training so the Air Force’s human pilots—and eventually, as more come online, those in the Navy and the Army—can get real-world experience in dogfights. In other words, these engineering marvels, rescued from the boneyard, are destined for fiery aerial deaths.

David Deptula is a retired Air Force lieutenant general, a former F-15 fighter pilot who went on to develop the Air Force’s policy on remotely piloted aircraft (the armed forces’ preferred term for drones). He’s been a vocal proponent of using so-called RPAs for the sort of missions traditionally reserved for manned craft. Still, he doesn’t see pilots being rendered obsolete soon. For complex, fluid situations, even supersonic drones can’t beat a flyboy in the cockpit. “I’ll put a manned aircraft against a remotely piloted aircraft any time,” he says, “and I’ll shoot it down.”

For the full story from BusinessWeek, click here.

Debra Cleghorn, Featured News

About the author

Executive editor About me: I’m a publishing professional who has a passion for aviation and RC, and I love creating issues, books and a website that help RC pilots to enjoy this sport even more. I admire scale aircraft and enjoy the convenience of flying smaller electrics.

3 Responses to “Real or RC? (It’s both!)”

  1. Bob kimpton says:

    2 things.
    No death by fire… Electronic fire.
    The Air Force guy had to say that manned aircraft were superior or loose his job. If we knew the truth, the budget for manned aircraft would b $0

  2. Edwin McGuire says:

    Amazing on one hand, But Scary on the other.

  3. Idris Aliyu Shuaibu says:

    This is some thing unbelievable. I am not a real pilot
    but i am an Rc pilot with 4yeas experience, i would have love
    all the fighter planes be made the same like the QF16.
    So that the Fighter pilot can live long for their friend & family.

Copyright © 2014 Air Age Media. All rights reserved.